Feed on
Posts
Comments

In is critical. Orthodox scholars deny that baptism means salvation. That is, baptism is not equivalent to salvation, as if the act saves. But they do not deny that it points towards salvation via a sacramental union with the washing of the body and the washing away of our sins through faith in Christ’s blood(y baptism). The salvation that we have in Christ is pictured in a variety of ways in baptism.

We might say that baptism is an identification with the people of God, and so part of its meaning has to do with associating with the church, which is Christ’s body. Baptism is a way of picturing our participation with Christ, and so union with Christ (or being clothed with Christ as Paul puts it; Gal 3:27) is part of the meaning. Baptism is done out of obedience, and so gratitude and submission to a heavenly Father are part of its meaning. As Christ was baptize in public, a public profession of faith (see the appendix in my Waters of Creation book on Timothy’s baptism) is part of its meaning. Also, since we have been made priestly brothers with Christ, our baptism into the priesthood is another way of describing this familial association that we have with Christ. Going down into the water and coming up alive is a picture of death and resurrection, the very things that we have obtained by grace through Christ.

In other words, baptism meaning is varied and nuanced, rich and deep. I suppose one could spend a lifetime thinking about it, which is what we are supposed to do as we remember throughout our lives the day we were baptized (I’ve always wondered how infants are able to do that). But always remember, baptism is a picture of Christ’s grace, and through your confession of The Faith and subsequent baptism into it, this grace nourishes and strengthens a weak and fragile faith throughout your life.

I was doing a search this week in my Logos Bible software and came upon a most curious and interesting set of by one of the named (c.a. 306-373 AD). In his “Hymns for the Feast of the Epiphany 12” he writes the following:

1. In Baptism Adam found again—that glory that was among the trees of Eden.-He went down, and received it out of the water;—he put it on, and went up and was adorned therein.—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

2. Man fell in the midst of Paradise,—and in baptism compassion restored him:-he lost his comeliness through Satan’s envy,—and found it again by God’s grace.-Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

3. The wedded pair were adorned in Eden;—but the serpent stole their crowns:-yet mercy crushed down the accursed one,—and made the wedded pair goodly in their raiment.—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

4. They clothed themselves with leaves of necessity;—but the Merciful had pity on their beauty,—and instead of leaves of trees,—He clothed them with glory in the water.—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

5. Baptism is the well-spring of life,—which the Son of God opened by His Life;-and from His Side it has brought forth streams.—Come, all that thirst, come, rejoice!—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

6. The Father has sealed Baptism, to exalt it;—and the Son has espoused it to glorify it;—and the Spirit with threefold seal—has stamped it, and it has shone in holiness.—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

7. The Trinity that is unsearchable—has laid up treasures in baptism.—Descend, ye poor, to its fountain!—and be enriched from it, ye needy!—Blessed be He that has mercy on all!

The Baptism Rite

When we talk about a , we are not asking if baptism is right (or wrong). The word “rite” refers to a prescribed and formal ceremonial act. Baptism is a rite in that it was prescribed by God in the Law (Ex 29:4), and renewed in new covenant fulfillment by Christ (Matt 28:19). It is given to the church (not to individuals who feel like baptizing themselves, per Robert Duval’s character in The Apostle) as priests (Ex 29:4; Mark 1:4) and prophets (2 Kgs 5:10) in the old covenant, and Apostles (John 4:2), Deacons (Acts 8:38) and Elders (Acts 2:8; cf. 1 Pet 5:1) in the NT are alone prescribed or by good and necessary consequence derived as baptizing others. Finally, there is a certain formulaic attachment to the rite, as instructed by Jesus to baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matt 28:19). We would do well to remember to keep the rite in the church and for the church in our day of anti-institutionalism. For, baptism is a holy and sacred rite.

Several Christian traditions teach that from the pure act of performing is achieved. Rome is the most well known. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) says, “By Baptism all sins are forgiven, original sin and all personal sins” (#1263). This must mean that salvation occurs, since not being baptized as an infant “invites us to trust in God’s mercy and to pray for their salvation” (#1283). In Protestant circles, the Church of Christ teaches that apart from immersion in water (i.e. baptism) salvation cannot be achieved. On the other hand, Scripture says that that we are saved by faith alone.

I can’t go into a huge defense of sola fide here. I merely want to point out the tricky part of their teachings. Both of the above mentioned sects say that you have to have faith to be saved, but faith alone is not enough. For Rome, children are baptized in the faith of the Church (#1282). “Baptism is the sacrament of faith. But faith needs the community of believers. It is only within the faith of the Church that each of the faithful can believe. . . The catechumen or the godparent is asked: ‘What do you ask of God’s Church?’ The response is: ‘Faith!’” (#1253). In other words, parents believe for their children, and through baptism, the infant is saved. Yet, the Scripture says that everyone man will die for his own sin (Jer 31:30) and conversely, each is saved from personal faith (Hab 2:4; Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38). In none of these instances is this faith a communal thing. Rather, if he (singular) shrinks back, God will take no pleasure in him. The Church of Christ teaches that baptism is a “faith response” to hearing the gospel. But here, they lack the ability to distinguish between gospel (which saves) and obedience (which results from salvation)! The reason a regenerated person would want to be baptized is because God has saved him or her, and has commanded baptism as the legal means whereby our initiation into the priesthood begins.

When any obedience is attached to faith as a means of salvation, you end up denying the very heart of the gospel which says that if it is by works (i.e. obedience), then we have something to boast about (Rom 4:2). Then, grace is no longer grace (Rom 11:6) and salvation is something that one man may achieve for himself or another by good works. That “justification” (pardon the play on the word) is repugnant to be because of its haughty origin and denial that salvation is by grace through faith alone.

What About Child Baptism?

Is there a difference between infant and ? I think so. Infant baptism follows (probably not as rigidly as it should) after the pattern set by Abraham’s circumcising his children (actually “boys” would be more technically correct). The idea is that baptism is the new covenant sign replacing circumcision as the old covenant sign. Since circumcision was given to infants (specifically 8 days old boys) in the old sign, covenant theology supposedly demands that we perform baptism on our infants (including girls?) unless we can find something explicitly repealing the way the covenant sign is administered. (This argument has a lot fallacies which we will in the course of time deal with in this blog, but which you can read about now in the book).

All infants are children, but not all children are infants. In fact, a good many children are of an age where they not only can profess faith, but demonstrate a desire and ability to serve God in his kingdom at their present age. Thus, I advocate child baptism, with no legalistic minimum placed on how young the baptism may occur, so long as the child is able to profess faith and serve God as one ordained in to the priesthood of the believer at their baptism, just like the priest was at his baptism. Because, after all, as the OT sign of the covenant—the Levitical administration of the covenant of grace—baptism was not administered to infants in the first place.

Greek Orthodox Baptism

I know that we Reformed Baptists have little in common with the Orthodox, but take a look at this aspect of . The following is taken from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America (http://www.goarch.org/chapel/liturgical_texts/baptism) It is in the baptism liturgy:

The Baptizing

“When he has anointed the whole body, the Priest baptizes him (her), holding him (her) erect, and looking towards the East, says:

The servant of God (Name) is baptized in the Name of the Father. Amen. And of the Son, Amen. And of the Holy Spirit, Amen.

At each invocation the Priest immerses him (her) and raises him (her) up again.”

You see, Greek Orthodox baptism, indeed all Orthodox baptism, is by immersion, even the baptism of infants! We may not see a lot of things eye to eye with the Orthodox, but it is fascinating to me that those who baptize by sprinkling always fail to point out that a church as old and as large as this one will never, under any circumstance, sprinkle anyone for baptism. It kind of puts a hole in the historic dam as argued by Rome and Protestant infant baptists.

The Sacrament of Baptism

Do Reformed Baptists believe in the ordinance or ? There is not total agreement on this issue. But it seems to me that to answer the question, we need to be clear as to the differences between an ordinance and a sacrament. To put it very simply, an ordinance is law and a sacrament is gospel.

Let me flesh this out. According to the Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms, an ordinance is, “A religious rite, similar to a ‘sacrament,’ engaged in as a memorial or act of obedience rather than as having sacramental efficacy” (emphasis mine). It defines a sacrament in the classic way as, “An outward sign instituted by God to convey an inward or spiritual grace” (emphasis mine).

The similarities between the two are that both are ordained by God/Christ (the third definition at www.dictionary.com for “ordinance” is “something believe to have been ordained, as by a deity”). Also, both are acts of remembrance for something done for us in the past. The differences, however, are striking. An ordinance stops at an act of obedience (the first two definitions of “ordinance” refer to laws), while a sacrament is a sign of inward grace. This is Law vs. Gospel. An ordinance is my Christian duty to God. A sacrament is God’s gift to his child granted through the obedience. While a sacrament is able to absorb everything about an ordinance (we obey, we remember), an ordinance is not able to absorb that which is unique about a sacrament. In an ordinance, God does nothing; we do everything. In a sacrament, God seals upon our hearts assurance of faith.

This is where the London Baptist Confession is helpful. Spurgeon’s edition says, “Infallible assurance is not so joined to the essence of faith that it is an automatic and inevitable experience. A true believer may wait long and faith with many difficulties before he becomes a partaker of it. Yet, being enabled by the spirit to know the things which are freely given to him by God, he may, without any extraordinary revelation attain this assurance by using the means of grace in the right way” (LBC 18.3). (Earlier editions of the Confession simply follow the WCF here and just say “means,” but the context makes it clear that they are a means to assurance, and what is assurance is not a grace given by God?). The language of “means” is the language of sacrament, since ordinances do not do anything. Therefore, my conclusion is that it is perfectly acceptable to believe in the sacrament of baptism as a Reformed Baptist.

It is very important to get clear in our heads what is and is not. Too many Baptists make the assumption that baptism is to be given only to those who are regenerated. In this thinking, “believer” and “regenerate” (“saved,” “elect” etc.) are identical referents. However, Scripture tells us that someone can be a believer without necessarily being regenerated. Simon the Sorcerer (Acts 8) is a good example of this.

It tells us that “Simon himself believed” and then was baptized (Acts 8:13). Yet, Peter makes it clear that Simon did not have saving faith, but only believed for the financial gain he thought would come with it. Thus Peter tells him, “May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money,” “repent of your wickedness,” “I see that you are in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity” (Acts 8:20-23). This seems to imply that Peter did not think of Simon as regenerate at all. His was not a saving faith, though it appeared so for a time. This is why he was called a “believer.”

“Believer” therefore signifies to us that a person has made a good confession of faith and that at the time of baptism, as the outward confession reflects a regenerated heart. That is, we do not baptize when we know that someone is obviously lying. But neither do we wait for some magical moment when we know that which only God can know: namely, that a person is regenerate and/or elect. This is why we at this blog call ourselves “.” Credo is the Latin for a creed or profession of faith. This is true believers baptism.

I think that and preaching ought to be there, side by side, each week in the worship of the church. Why? People who say that communion each week would get old and stale, still want sermons every week. What is not often understood is that communion and baptism are means of grace, visible signs of the same gospel that is supposed to be presented to the assembly in the form of the preached word. In our church, we have communion every week, except those weeks when we have a baptism. When communion-baptism is put forward, it is also important to have some kind of teaching time, so that the visible word is combined with a special word instructing the people as to how the sign seals the righteousness that we have by faith to our hearts, helping to sanctify believers who always need “good news” to comfort them.

Baptism History

I have created a chart so that you can easily identify some of the major baptisms recorded in the Scripture. This chart follows some of the ideas presented in the NT, Church history, and my book.

Biblical Time Line of Important Baptisms (Assuming No Gaps in the Genealogies)

Baptism History Chart

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »